NO G8: Report from Heiligendamm
|
"The reasons for such a confrontation include the G8's policies on aid to Africa, the propagation of neoliberal economic globalization, the neglect of the fight against AIDS, and the inherent and rabid undemocratic nature of the G8 itself, among many others."
|
Words and photos by David Zlutnick This year's meeting of the Group of 8 (or G8, the 7 richest nations in the world: Great Britain, United States, Germany, France, Japan, Italy, and Canada, plus Russia) was held in the resort of Heiligendamm, Germany from June 6-8th. At the meeting 13% of the world's population was "represented" while policies were decided that will have tremendous effect for the other 87%. In response tens of thousands of demonstrators arrived in the area in an effort to shut down the summit. The reasons for such a confrontation include the G8's policies on aid to Africa, the propagation of neoliberal economic globalization, the neglect of the fight against AIDS, and the inherent and rabid undemocratic nature of the G8 itself, among many others. What follows is a brief report back from the front lines of the fight to shut down the G8. For more information check out http://de.indymedia.org/en/. Repression On May 9th state repression of anti-G8 organizing exploded with the raid of 40 sites including private homes, social centers, and the alternative web provider SO36.net. The locations of what were to be convergence centers in Hamburg and Berlin were searched by police. The reason given for these provocations was that they were needed in order to stop leftist groups who were allegedly forming "terrorist organizations." However, after the police admitted they had made no arrests and found absolutely no evidence of a terrorist plot or any illicit materials, it became quite obvious that the real reason behind the raids was simply to smash the infrastructure that had formed to counter the G8 summit. But the plans of the German police seemed to have failed as following the raids thousands spontaneously took to the streets in cities across Germany to denounce the raids and public support for the G8 opposition grew tremendously. Around the actual site of the summit in Heiligendamm a 12 km security fence was built at the cost of $17 million in order to protect the grounds from protests, and a no-go zone was created to keep people from getting anywhere near the fence. During May most of the planned demonstrations were banned by the Kavala (special police) despite having already received permits. After lawsuits were filed for reasons of unconstitutionality many were then re-permitted, only to be banned once again days before the G8 began. Another measure the German state took to repress the anti-G8 movement was the use of travel bans and the closure of relatively open borders within the European Union. This same tactic was used to defend the G8 in Genoa in 2001, where activists were turned away at the French border and prevented from entering Italy. Read More... |


+ Enlarge
+ Enlarge
+ Enlarge
Our website is back up.
Check it out:
mediainsurgente.com
Thanks,
David
Yeah, the link's correct at the end of the article, but I think you wrote it wrong. It's mediainsurgente.com. However the website is down right now as we're having some technical difficulties. If you're interested in our films though you can go to youtube.com and search for "media insurgente" and our trailers will come up.
Thanks for your interest.
- David
I checked out faultlines.org. Very radical politics, but well written. The mediainsurgente.com link was broken (and mediainsurgent.com seemed to be a parked domain). Is it down or is the link wrong?
I'm continually surprised at the assertion that the wealth of one nation has a direct, causitive effect on the poverty of another. If Great Britain weren't rich, would Nigeria become wealthy? And if so
There seems to be a very strange inconsistency to this whole thing that I wonder if you could clarify. Camp Rostock and Camp Reddlich seemed to be highly organized ventures. Camp Rostock, the article mentions, has been in operation for months. The article frequently alludes to "state" repression of the protests. Would the donation of an entire school building to a private, radical cause seem to be a conflict of interest to a vast, "anti-anti-G8" conspiracy? Could the state simply have reprimanded the officials who donated the building and have ended it there (one would assume that the Bundestag can override the decisions of small Municipalities). Would insurgency be more effective in non state-owned buildings?
With the donation and setup of camps, what were the cost of operations for such centers? Food, electricity (running video editing stations for extended amounts of time must draw larger amounts of electricity), sewage, etc. Who, besides the state, are providing these funds?
Great article. I'll have to try and make it to the 2008 "festivities" in Toyako. ;)
-JB
Good points OB, and nice article David. I'm not committed to every implication of the politics behind the protests, but congrats on producing an important historical record of the event.
As for 2008, I lived for two years near Toyako and could help anyone plan a combination backcountry hiking and protesting trip.
-tim