The World Wide Web
|
The front page of today’s Chicago Tribune has an article that is the first in an extended series of economic-themed travel articles to be written in the coming weeks by Tribune foreign correspondent Evan Osnos. His journey will take him into the vast Western part of the country. Today’s article, “Rural exodus to Chongqing part of revolutionary global shift” is about the mass migration of peasants to “infant mega-cities” in China, those like Chongqing that hardly anyone has heard of (unlike Shanghai or Beijing) but that boast populations over 5 million. This smart article points out that sometime next year the UN predicts the world will, for the first time in its history, have more people living in urban centers rather than rural areas. This is significant, Osnos writes, because a migrant from rural China who moves into a city consumes three times the energy in the urban center. The strain on the planet will be enormous, perhaps catastrophic. But no one can deny the improvements in the daily lives of China’s peasants and their families; for many, the only way to escape deep poverty is to migrate to the cities. This got me thinking about sustainability, but also about the way many of us in the West view these poorer nations and their multitudes of impoverished people. I think that, in many respects, we want the poor to stay poor—not so that they literally struggle but so that the country can retain a similar feel as it has had, hence making travel there authentic and, well, a stark contrast to our Westernized lives. It reminded me of a conversation I had with a Moroccan friend while visiting his nation’s capital of Rabat with him in May. Along the river, at the base of an antique fortress that looks out the Atlantic, a giant mega mall is being built, equipped with Western stores, restaurants, an ice skating rink, and other amenities we know belong in big malls. I cringed, slightly, when Mohammed told me this. “Well what do you want?” he said.” “You can’t expect the country not to build and improve the lives of the people just because you want to visit a Third World country.” Mohammed was absolutely right, and I felt wrong about the way I had marginalized his country and people. But uncountable conversations with other travelers have revealed that many people think like this, consciously or not. It’s a big ole web with no clear answers, this mingling of sustainability, globalization, poverty, economic improvement, the environment, and quality of life. Talking about it, reading about it—it all helps. |

I think that, in many respects, we want the poor to stay poor—not so that they literally struggle but so that the country can retain a similar feel as it has had, hence making travel there authentic and, well, a stark contrast to our Westernized lives.
BINGO! Actually, I find the same thing in the states. If you listen to the "Wal-Mart" argument (e.g.: Wal-mart is the devil) you'll find urbanites--who have no need to go to Wal-Mart--want them to pack and return the "mom and pops". Problem is, "mom and pop", collectively, have committed more worker abuses--at higher cost--than any individual Wal-Mart.
Logistically, though, I grew up 4 miles from the nearest store of any kind . Heaven forbid, if I wanted something other than ground beef, we'd have to travel 33 more miles. Wal-Mart comes along, and 33 miles of fuel consumption is saved, prices go down, and jobs are created. Suddenly someone who lives 250 miles away from us and has everything they'll ever need within 3 miles, is upset because they think every grocery store cashier should make $15/hr with 401k and benefits.
I think this same philosophy appears in "certain" kinds of international activism.
Sustainability--you nailed it right on the head. I grow weary of finding "culture" because half the time when culture is "preserved", its done so only because there is economic benefit...not because people are interested in living as they did "in the olden times."
-JB
Was this it? "Goodbye, Khao San Road"?
http://www.salon.com/travel/diary/pott/1999/10/12/potts/index.html
If you're a Rolf fan you may already know this, but he has almost all his stories linked to, indexed by country, at Rolfpotts.com. It's a sweet place to procrastinate.
Hey Adam - Great blog! (I really liked yesterday's about Spain, too...) This is tricky stuff - definitely an element of selfishness in wanting these places to stay the same, but also, it would be easier to watch them change if it seemed like some of the things we (I, anyway) are proud of were being adopted, rather than just the somewhat embarassing things like McDonalds and mega-malls. It often seems, to a superficial observer at least, like "western society" is being cloned, but it's mostly the bad qualities that are being transferred. Sorry for the Star Trek reference, but it reminds me of Data and Lore. Does that make sense?
Absolutely, and it's a great comparison. I agree with you too that it is often our more trivial cultural assets that get brought into developing countries, but not always. Arguably America's greatest cultural invention was the motion picture, and in places like India, South America, and elsewhere there are thriving film scenes. But I do know that when I first arrived in Spain last year I was shocked by how many Burger Kings and KFC's were everywhere. Not to mention hearing "Pour Some Sugar On Me" playing on a bus in rural Andalucia. Globalization isn't all bad, though, and there's a great article by Rolf Potts about Bangkok and how it isn't only bad news when a new place gets discovered. It's not exactly the same theme but similar. I don't know what it's called but if you're interested I'll find out. Thanks for reading and responding.