La 65
|
Every country, every town, has a road or a building or a park to which a name of historical significance has been attached. As the years pass, the number of locals who remember what the name means dwindles and the transplants to the community just call it what it is, thinking little, if at all, about its name. The place becomes part of the landscape, the taken-for-granted background upon which disappearing stories are inscribed and daily life is lived. For me, a temporary resident of Puerto Rico, 65 Infanteria, or la 65, was just a road. It was the traffic-choked highway between San Juan and our friend's home tucked away in the damp and wild green hills of Rio Grande. It was an eyesore, evidence of all that has gone wrong with the island: too many cars and car dealerships, too many mega-stores, too much cross-cutting, too many subdivisions with too many cutesy names, too many bulldozers, too much black smoke, and too little thoughtfulness. It was a vendors' makeshift mobile mini-mall. From 4 to 6 PM, la 65 was chock-a-block with young men darting between cars at red lights, selling bottled water, cocos, cangrejos, quenepas (if the season was right), and all other manner of edible wares. Permanent installations on the shoulder of the road included metal drums turned into improvised grills and fogatas where a variety of foods were fried and served piping hot and still dripping with oil to hungry hands that rolled down windows for this local fast food, and the lonely looking older man who sold homemade bizcocho out of the bed of his pick-up. And if appetites weren't satisfied, la 65 also offered up any number of bars and sex shops where a lonely driver could get a fix. I knew what "infanteria" meant, of course--infantry--but it never occurred to me to wonder why the road was named 65 Infanteria or what the significance of la 65 was. It wasn't until last week--in New York--that I learned who and what la 65 was, and it wasn't because I sought out the information. In the documentary, "The Borinqueneers," directors Noemi Figueroa Soulet and Raquel Ortiz resurrected the not-so-distant but largely forgotten history of the 65th Infantry, the U.S. Army's all-Puerto Rican unit that was responsible for guarding U.S. installations in Puerto Rico and Panama--both strategic locations for U.S. military operations--until the 1930s. La 65 was also one of the first Army units sent to the war in Korea, its members fighting passionately--and, Army officials, said, valiantly and most expertly--for a country that was (and remains) happy to enlarge its troop force without ever conceding the full rights, privileges, and responsibilities of U.S. citizenship upon them. 61,000 "Borinqueneers" fought in Korea, and one of every 42 soldiers who died in service during the Korean War was Puerto Rican. The story was moving, but it has particular resonance at this moment, poised as we are between the news that the 4,000th American soldier has been killed in Iraq and the impending presidential primary vote, which takes place in Puerto Rico in early June. Puerto Ricans are not permitted to vote in the final presidential election--just the primaries, which makes the loss of between 60 and 80 Puerto Rican soldiers in the war* all the more maddening. The veterans of 65 Infanteria held a range of political perspectives: Some asserted that Puerto Rico should be incorporated, once and for all, into the United States as the 51st state. Some argued that the status quo of the commonwealth is confusing but functional, the best of both worlds. And some, especially those who were bitter about the way they were treated as soldiers who gave their all, advocated independence. I don't know if I'll ever drive on la 65 again, but if I do, I'll think of these men and all the Puerto Rican soldiers who continue to fight for the United States. La 65 isn't only the worst of the island; it's the best, too.
*Figures documenting the deaths of Puerto Rican soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan vary. According to a blog written by El Nuevo Dia journalist Jose Delgado, Pentagon figures state that as of March 2008, 68 Puerto Ricans have died in service in the war, while the Puerto Rican activist group, Madres Contra la Guerra (Mothers Against the War), have counted more than 80 deaths. |

I found your site and enjoyed reading your comments about my documentary film THE BORINQUENEERS and about "La Avenida 65 de Infanteria" or "La 65". In fact, many people have never heard of the 65th which was what prompted me to spend 9 years of my life producing it. Sadly, I have even met young people raised in Puerto Rico who although they had heard of "La 65" had never heard of "El 65" (the regiment) and did not know WHAT the 65th Avenue had been named for. By enlightening you and many others like you about the service of THE BORINQUENEERS, we have fulfilled our mission.
By the way, regarding the stats, although the count of fatalities for Puerto Rico (39) may seem small, amongst Puerto Ricans the tally is higher since we include in our list Puerto Ricans killed who resided in the mainland U.S. I used to keep track of the number but no longer do so.
For those interested in seeing THE BORINQUENEERS documentary film, check out your local PBS station to inquire about air dates or visit our website at www.borinqueneers.com to purchase the DVD. Thanks.
Noemi Figueroa Soulet, Executive Producer
UPDATE:
After I posted this blog, I contacted Chuck Vinch, who maintains statistics about soldier fatalities for Military Times. Here's what I wrote:
"I am writing because I would like to know if you are able to provide any statistics about casualties and fatalities among soldiers serving in Afghanistan and Iraq who are from Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, and Guam.
My specific questions are:
-How many soldiers are serving from each of these three commonwealths?
-How many casualties from each commonwealth have been recorded?
-How many fatalities from each commonwealth have been recorded?"
And here's what he wrote:
"unfortunately, I can only answer your third question. On your second question, the Defense Department does not release personal details of the wounded, I presume because of privacy considerations. As for your first question, that is data to which I simply don't have access. You'd have to go to the Defense Department for that. The public affairs representative in the DoD media relations office who would handle that question is Army Lt. Col. Jonathan Withington. You can email him at
Here's the answer to your third question (you only asked for Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam, but I am giving you total U.S. military fatalities in Iraq and Afghanistan from every U.S. territory, commonwealth and protectorate):
Puerto Rico: 39
Guam: 9
American Samoa: 8
U.S. Virgin Islands: 6
Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth: 5
Federated States of Micronesia: 3"
What an interesting job, maintaining statistics about soldier fatalities. Chuck Vinch must be a fascinating character to talk to at dinner parties. ;)
I'm curious--and I think we've touched upon this before--are Puerto Ricans "citizens" of the United States? Are they issued SSNs? Can they move freely (even if only relatively) between PR and CONUS?
I guess what I'm getting at is, if they have no representation, what do they have to gain from enlisting? Are they granted citizenship? Issued an SSN?
He probably avoids dinner parties. ;)
Puerto Ricans are citizens officially. They carry US passports, they have SSNs, they can move freely between the island and "the mainland." The main difference is that they don't have true representation.
And therein lies the rub: they get nothing from enlisting, other than the surge of pride that any soldier feels, I suppose, from representing his or her country. That and, as is also the case for many mainland soldiers, the promise (hopefully) of money to go to school or pursue other life opportunities.
Someone told me that they had seen my name mentioned on this site, and since we're all narcissists in the Internet age, I had to go take a look. Just thought you and Olivebeard might like to know that maintaining the in-house database of U.S. war casualties is only one of several dozen duties that I have as a managing editor at those newspapers. Oh, and my dinner-party skills are quite decent, if I do say so myself. Sorry I couldn't help you more with your data search, novoarte. I'll close with my own little winky emoticon, just to show that I can take a little snark at my expense, even from people who don't know the first thing about me ;)
Hi, Chuck-
Glad you dropped in! I wasn't snarking at all; sorry you felt I was. One of my biggest pet peeves is people who talk about others without knowing the first thing about them. You did help me quite a bit. In fact, though I haven't replied yet-- you provided clarity in response to a matter that had been quite obscure. I appreciated your response. I'm sure you can hold your own at a dinner party-- in fact, if you're ever in Long Island City, I invite you to dinner. :) And I hope you'll join the community here because I'm sure you have lots of interesting stories to share. Thanks for your message.
Peace,
Julie
Wow. I've said this before on one of your blogs, Julie, but here it is again: So much for "no taxation without representation". I wonder how many people in the US currently live under political conditions that were deemed worth going to war over in 1776...
Cool find. I'd like to check out the documentary...and Puerto Rico, one day.